Defense services for DUI and DWI offenses in the Clearwater and St Petersburg areas.
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Result:
DUI to Careless Driving
8/20/25
SUmmary:
Our client was involved in a traffic crash, and when law enforcement responded, they observed indicators of impairment and suspected the defendant was under the influence of drugs. The client provided a breath result of 0.000 and submitted to urine testing. Mr. Sullivan submitted correspondence to the State outlining factual issues with the DUI charge. The State agreed to reduce the charge to careless driving with a withhold of adjudication.
Case #ALDI0CE
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
8/20/25
SUmmary:
The defendant was stopped by law enforcement for driving too fast around a turn, screeching tires, and operating the vehicle without headlights. The defendant performed poorly on field sobriety exercises and admitted to consuming wine prior to driving. The defendant provided a breath result of 0.149. Mr. Sullivan submitted correspondence to the State outlining mitigating factors and issues with the breath-testing machine, and the State Attorney’s Office agreed to amend the charge from DUI to reckless driving.
Case #AKWRBXE
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
7/30/25
SUmmary:
The defendant was stopped for driving without headlights. Following the stop, law enforcement alleged signs of intoxication, including bloodshot, watery, glassy eyes, droopy eyelids, and the odor of alcohol. The defendant performed poorly on field sobriety exercises and provided breath results of 0.12 and 0.12 after the arrest. Mr. Sullivan submitted persuasive correspondence to the State, and the State agreed to amend the charge from DUI to reckless driving.
Case #AJF4QWE
Result:
Nolle Prosequi
7/25/25
SUmmary:
The defendant was involved in a rear-end collision and was determined to be at fault. When law enforcement responded to the scene, officers observed what they claimed were classic signs of impairment and believed the defendant was under the influence of drugs. The defendant submitted to both breath and urine testing. Mr. Sullivan prepared correspondence to the State outlining several factual issues, and the State ultimately dismissed the charge.
Case #AKYVNNE
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
7/23/25
SUmmary:
The defendant was stopped for having an expired registration. During the stop, law enforcement observed indicators of impairment, including the odor of alcohol, bloodshot and watery eyes, glassy eyes, and poor balance. The defendant performed poorly on field sobriety exercises and submitted to breath testing, with results of 0.12 and 0.11. Mr. Sullivan presented persuasive correspondence outlining significant mitigation, and the State agreed to reduce the charge from DUI to reckless driving.
Case #AKIWCWE
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
7/17/25
SUmmary:
Our client was stopped for erratic driving. Following the traffic stop, law enforcement claimed to observe classic signs of impairment, including bloodshot watery eyes, slurred speech, and the odor of alcohol. The client declined to submit to roadside field sobriety exercises and also refused the breath test. Mr. Sullivan prepared persuasive correspondence to the State, and the State agreed to reduce the DUI charge to reckless driving.
Case #AI96H7E
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
7/16/25
SUmmary:
The defendant went out for food and drinks with a friend and, while driving home, realized it was unsafe to continue driving. The defendant pulled over in a parking lot to sleep and did not have a phone available to contact an Uber or Lyft. Law enforcement observed the defendant in the vehicle with the keys and arrested the defendant for DUI under the theory of actual physical control. Following the arrest, the defendant refused a breath test. Mr. Sullivan presented mitigation to the State, including the defendant’s efforts to make a responsible decision by not driving, and the State agreed to amend the charge from DUI to reckless driving.
Case #AJF4QUE
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
7/8/25
SUmmary:
The defendant was arrested at a Tesla charging station after being found intoxicated in his vehicle. The defendant submitted to both breath and urine testing. Mr. Sullivan presented a defense that the vehicle was inoperable because both the Tesla’s battery and the defendant’s cell phone battery, which functioned as the vehicle’s key, were dead. Based on this legal issue, the State agreed to amend the charge from DUI to reckless driving, with only a fine and no probation.
Case #AK4TBRE
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
6/25/25
SUmmary:
The defendant was leaving Clearwater Beach and was stopped for speeding and failing to maintain a single lane. Our client performed poorly on the walk-and-turn and one-leg-stand field sobriety tests but is 67 years old. The defendant was arrested for DUI and subsequently submitted to a breath test, producing a result of 0.11. Mr. Sullivan submitted mitigation to the State, and the State agreed to amend the charge from DUI to reckless driving.
Case #AKBH0HE
Result:
DUI to Careless Driving
6/24/25
SUmmary:
Our client was stopped by law enforcement for running a stop sign. After the traffic stop, law enforcement alleged that the defendant exhibited classic signs of impairment, including the odor of alcohol, bloodshot watery eyes, and slurred speech. Mr. Sullivan prepared persuasive correspondence outlining factual issues with the case, and the State agreed to amend the charge from DUI to careless driving with a withhold of adjudication. This outcome means the client did not receive any points and is eligible to have the record of the arrest sealed or expunged.
Case #AKTEL4E
Result:
DUI to Careless Driving
6/24/25
SUmmary:
Our client was stopped by law enforcement for running a stop sign. After the traffic stop, law enforcement alleged that the defendant exhibited classic signs of impairment, including the odor of alcohol, bloodshot watery eyes, and slurred speech. Mr. Sullivan prepared persuasive correspondence outlining factual issues with the case, and the State agreed to amend the charge from DUI to careless driving with a withhold of adjudication. This outcome means the client did not receive any points and is eligible to have the record of the arrest sealed or expunged.
Case #AKTEL3E
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
6/19/25
SUmmary:
The defendant was stopped for traveling 65 miles per hour in a 45-mile-per-hour zone. After the traffic stop, law enforcement observed indicators of impairment, including bloodshot, watery eyes and the odor of alcohol. The defendant performed poorly on field sobriety exercises and was arrested for DUI. Following the arrest, the defendant refused to provide a breath test. Mr. Sullivan submitted persuasive correspondence to the State outlining mitigation, and the State agreed to amend the charge from DUI to reckless driving.
Case #AI96GOE
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
6/13/25
SUmmary:
In this case, the defendant was arrested for a second DUI offense after being stopped for speeding. During the traffic stop, law enforcement reported multiple indicators of impairment, including the odor of alcohol, bloodshot watery eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant performed moderately on roadside field sobriety exercises and was ultimately arrested for DUI, providing a breath result of 0.089. Mr. Sullivan prepared correspondence outlining mitigating factors in the case, and the State agreed to amend the charge to reckless driving with a withhold of adjudication and no probation.
Case #AI96H2E
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
5/29/25
SUmmary:
The defendant was involved in a traffic crash and subsequently exhibited indicators of impairment, including slurred speech, swaying, and confusion. The client declined to submit to field sobriety exercises and breath testing. Because of the accident, the defendant was deemed ineligible for the Pinellas County DUI Diversion Program. Nevertheless, Mr. Sullivan submitted persuasive correspondence to the State Attorney’s Office, and the State agreed to amend the charge from DUI to reckless driving.
Case #AJF4RDE
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
5/15/25
SUmmary:
The defendant was stopped by law enforcement after a concerned citizen reported erratic driving. Law enforcement observed indicators of impairment, including the odor of alcohol and slurred speech. The defendant began performing field sobriety exercises but ultimately declined to complete them and was arrested for DUI. This was the defendant’s second DUI offense. Mr. Sullivan presented mitigation to the State, and the State agreed to reduce the charge from DUI to reckless driving.
Case #AKBH00E
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
2/27/25
SUmmary:
Our client was stopped by law enforcement upon blocking a crosswalk with his vehicle. Our client exhibited signs of impairment during initial contact with the officers, and further impairment during field sobriety tests. Our client refused to submit to a breath test requested by law enforcement. This was our client’s second arrest for DUI. Mr. Sullivan prepared substantial mitigation in the case and the State agreed to reduce the charge of DUI to Reckless Driving.
Case #AJB3XHE
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
2/27/25
SUmmary:
Our client was observed by law enforcement swerving and driving in excess of the speed limit. Contact was made with law enforcement where they observed our client to have slurred speech and trouble balancing. During field sobriety tests, our client appeared to exhibit further signs of impairment. Our client refused to take a breath test for law enforcement. Mr. Sullivan was able to prepare mitigating correspondence to the State which ultimately led to a reduction in charge of DUI to Reckless Driving.
Case #AJB3X4E
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
1/6/25
SUmmary:
The Defendant was stopped for speeding over the Courtney Campbell Causeway. Law enforcement detected indicators of impairment and elected to conduct a DUI investigation. The Defendant declined to submit to roadside tests. As a result, the Defendant was arrested for DUI. The Defendant had a prior conviction for DUI less than five years ago. After arrest, the Defendant declined breath testing as well. Mr. Sullivan presented mitigation to the State Attorney’s Office and was able to secure a reduction in the charge from DUI to Reckless Driving. The Defendant received a “Withhold of Adjudication,” which means that the Defendant was not even convicted of the reckless driving offense.
Case #AIQEXQE
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
12/12/24
SUmmary:
The client was stopped by law enforcement when he was observed having difficulty maintaining a single lane, eventually striking a curb. Our client submitted to breath testing with results above the legal limit of .124/.129. Mr. Sullivan was able to prepare mitigation to the state, ultimately resulting in an agreement to reduce the charge from Driving Under the Influence to Reckless Driving.
Case #AJF4D2E
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
12/6/24
SUmmary:
Mr. Sullivan was retained on this matter more than a year after the case began. The client had previously retained a lawyer from Tampa who did not regularly practice DUI defense. The case was at a point. where the State was unwilling to reduce the charge to Reckless Driving, and the matter was set for jury trial with the State indicating that it was seeking jail after trial. After Mr. Sullivan got involved, he negotiated with the prosecutor, pointing out the mitigating circumstances and factual issues with the case. As a result, Mr. Sullivan successfully negotiated a disposition that avoided jail, but also resulted in the charge being reduced to Reckless Driving. This meant that our client avoided a driver’s license suspension, increased insurance requirements and the stigma associated with a DUI conviction.
Case #AI9MEVE
Result:
DUI to Reckless Driving
11/21/24
SUmmary:
Our client was the subject of a traffic stop for speeding with his high beams activated. Upon contact with law enforcement, our client submitted to a breath test which resulted in two readings above the legal limit of .08 at 0.143 and 0.146. The client was charged with DUI. Mr. Sullivan prepared correspondence to the state attorney’s office which included several mitigating factors, resulting in the reduction of charge from DUI to Reckless Driving.
Case #AJF48LE
If you have been arrested for a DUI, Drunk Driving, DWI, or Driving Under the Influence charge in the Tampa Bay area arising out of St. Petersburg, Clearwater, or any other location within Pinellas County, we are highly rated DUI lawyers who can help.
Attorney Tim Sullivan is an experienced and qualified attorney. Our team is dedicated to defending your rights and protecting your privilege to drive. Our office also routinely deals with the DHSMV in making application for driving permits and Florida hardship driver’s licenses.
You cannot take the benefit of this law automatically! It requires the filing of specialized paperwork and careful attention to Florida DHSMV procedures. Therefore, having the advice of an experienced attorney is critical for avoiding the potential pitfalls and mistakes that can leave you without a driver’s license.
When searching for a good DUI lawyer in Pinellas County to protect your best interests and driving privilege, you should carefully consider the attorney’s training, skill, and qualifications. We are former state prosecutors who handle DUI cases only arising out of Pinellas County, including:
Judges and assistant state attorneys are accustomed to seeing us in their courtrooms on a daily basis. Likewise, with nearly 20 years of experience in the Pinellas County court systems, we understand how the system works. Let us evaluate the facts of your DUI charge, formulate defenses, and discuss getting your DUI reduced to reckless driving
Certified DUI Intoxilyzer Operators
If an Intoxilyzer was used in your case, we have the “know how” to examine the validity of the operator’s permit and to examine the machine’s calibration records. A failure of the police to properly comply with administrative rules may render your breath test results inadmissible in court.
Intoxilyzer Machine Inspector
Attorney Tim Sullivan is one of just a few Florida lawyers trained in FDLE curriculum to inspect and evaluate the maintenance protocol of the Intoxilyzer 8000 used in your case. Breath testing results are only admissible in court if the machine has passed regular local and state inspections.
"Masters of DUI” Program
Each lawyer has successfully fulfilled the prerequisites of the 2016 Masters of DUI Program conducted through the Florida Bar’s Department of Continuing Education..
Graduates of the NCDD at Harvard Law School
Attorney Tim Sullivan completed an intensive course of study at the National College for DUI Defense. This advanced-level training in the art of DUI advocacy is widely recognized by lawyers as a superior “hands on” approach to learning top notch DUI defense strategy.
Defense services for DUI and DWI offenses
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
2380 Drew Street, Unit 6
Clearwater, FL 33765
Phone: (727) 855-3847
©2024 The Law Office of Timothy Sullivan All Rights Reserved. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience. This web site provides general information only since the facts and circumstances of your case are unique. The information presented on this website is not to be interpreted as formal legal advice nor does it constitute the formation of an attorney/client relationship.