Our case studies provide a closer look at how we’ve helped clients navigate challenging DUI charges and achieve favorable outcomes. While every case is different, these examples highlight our strategic approach, dedication, and commitment to protecting our clients’ rights and futures.
Although the Defendant, a minor, was not arrested for DUI, his license was suspended for an “.02” violation. Our office challenged the suspension on the client’s behalf. The department ultimately invalidated the suspension after our team argued that law enforcement failed to meet its burden to establish that our client had driven a car as a minor after consuming alcohol.
The Defendant was stopped for traveling at excessive speeds and going into the bike lane. Law eenforcement detected numerous signs of impairment. Our client refused field tests and breath testing. Our office submitted mitigation to the State and the prosecutor agreed to amend the charge from DUI to Reckless Driving.
The Defendant was the subject of a traffic stop for speeding. Law enforcement detected numerous indicators of impairment. The Defendant submitted to breath testing with results of .149. Our office submitted mitigation and the State agreed to amend the charge to Reckless Driving.
The Defendant was charged with DUI after a traffic crash. He performed fairly on FSE’s considering the crash. His urine showed the presence of pain medication and antianxiety medication. At trial, our office argued that there was a lack of evidence of impairment by controlled substances. The jury agreed with our position and returned a verdict of not guilty. This was our client’s second DUI arrest, so he avoided 6-12 months of no driving at all.
The Defendant was stopped for traveling 85 in a 55 zone. Law enforcement detected signs of impairment. The defendant provided a breath result of .159. Our office submitted mitigation and the prosecutor agreed to amend the charge from DUI to Reckless Driving.
The Defendant was the subject of a traffic stop for speeding. Law enforcement detected indicators of impairment and arrested the defendant for DUI. Our client refused breath testing. Our office submitted mitigation to the State, and the Court ultimately agreed to amend the charge to Reckless Driving.
The Defendant was stopped by law enforcement, arrested for DUI, and purportedly refused a breath test. Our office submitted scientific evidence demonstrating that our client was not impaired. The prosecutor reviewed our evidence and agreed to amend the charge from DUi to a non-criminal charge of Careless Driving.
The Defendant was investigated for DUI following a single vehicle crash. Our client performed fairly on FSE’s, but provided breath results of .146. Our office submitted mitigation to the State and the prosecutor agreed to amend the charge from DUI to Reckless Driving.
The Defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. Law enforcement detected clues of impairment. The Defendant provided a breath result of .145. Our office submitted mitigation to the State, and the prosecutor agreed to amend the charge to Reckless Driving.
The Defendant was the subject of a traffic stop for reckless driving and speeding. Law enforcement detected multiple indicators of imapirment. The Defendant refused field sobriety tests and breath tests. Our office presented mitigation to the prosecutor and the State agreed to amend the charge to Reckless Driving.
The Defendant was stopped for speeding. Subsequent to the stop, the defendant performed poorly on FSE’s, and provided a breath result of .118. Our office submitted mitigation to the State, and the State agreed to amend the charge from DUI to Reckless Driving.
The Defendant was stopped for no headlights. Subsequent to the stop, law enforcement detected numerous indicators of impairment. The defendant provided a breath alcohol level of .153. Our office submitted mitigation and the State agreed to amend the charge from DUI to Recklerss Driving.
