Client was pulled over for weaving on his motorcycle. Client was a CDL holder, so a conviction for DUI would disrupt his livelihood. Client performed slightly below average on FSE’s and submitted a breath result that was .13. Mr. Sullivan submitted a mitigation packet to the state attorney outlining problems with the case as well as the disproportionate effects that a DUI conviction would have on our client. Based upon this thorough analysis, the State agreed to reduce the charge to Reckless Driving.

Client was involved in a minor traffic accident. Law enforcement responded and suspected that the client was impaired. She was placed under arrest and subsequent to arrest she provided breath results of .000. She then provided urine that showed the presence of certain prescription medications. Mr. Sullivan found many problems with the case and presented that to the State. The State agreed to reduce the charges with no probation or classes, and no conviction. This means that the client is now eligible to pursue a sealing of the official government records.

Defendant was involved in a minor rear-end collisioin for which he was determined to be at fault. Law enforcement arrived on the scene and elected to conduct a DUI investigation after observing what they believed to be indicators of impairment. The client declined to submit to field sobriety tests, and subsequently declined to submit to breath testing. The Defendant was arrested for DUI, making this the client’s second DUI arrest. Mr. Sullivan presented mitigation to the State and they agreed to reduce the charges from DUI to Reckless Driving.

Defendant was stopped for a “move over act” violation. He subsequenty performed above-average on FSE’s but was nevertheless arrested. Subsequent to his arrest, he provided breath samples that were slightly more than two times the legal limit with results of .17/.17. Mr. Sullivan conducted a forensic examination of the records associated with the machine and discovered a multitude of issues which called into question the reliability of the results. Mr. Sullivan set the case for jury trial. The State agreed to reduce the charge to Reckless Driving.

Defendant was involved in a minor traffic accident. The police investigated and believed that the defendant was impaired. Subsequent to arrest, the Defendant submitted to breath testing. The State ultimately agreed to reduce the charge to Reckless Driving based upon mitigation submitted by Mr. Sullivan.

Defendant was involved in a rear-end collission. She was transported to a local hospital to be medically cleared. The officer believed that she was impaired and requested a blood sample. The client declined. Mr. Sullivan presented varoius legal arguments regarding the illegality of law enforcement’s request for blood. The State agreed to reduce the charge.

Defendant was stopped for a traffic infraction for failing to come to a complete stop at a stop sign. Defendant performed above average on FSE’s. Nevertheless, he was arrested for DUI. Subsequent to his arrest, he declined to provide a breath sample. Mr. Sullivan presented mitigation and the State agreed to reduce the charge.

Defendant was involved in an unusual altercation where he attempted to prevent a tow truck driver from towing his girlfriend’s vehicle. Police were called and he was investigated for DUI. Because of his size and physical limitations, he performed poorly on FSE’s. He subsequently provided a breath sample. Mr. Sullivan presented mitigation and the State agreed to reduce the charge to Reckless Driving.

Defendant was involved in an alleged reckless driving episode. When law enforcement made contact with him, they detected indicators of impairment and placed him under arrest for DUI. Subsequent breath testing revealed a BAC above .15. Mr. Sullivan presented scientific evidence demonstrating that he was below .15 at the time of driving. The state agreed and treated his case as a below .15 disposition. This allowed the client to avoid a mandatory 6 month interlock.

Defendant was charged with a second offense DUI. An anonymous citizen reported that she was impaired leaving a bar. Subsequent to her arrest, she declined to submit to breath testing. After a two year legal battle challenging the legality of the traffic stop, the State agreed to reduce the charge to Reckless Driving

Defendant was stopped leaving his employment as a bartender after the police observed a traffic infraction. The police smelled alcohol on his breath and conducted a DUI investigation. Client performed above-average on FSE’s. He ultimately was arrested and provided a breath sample of .14. Mr. Sullivan presented mitigation and scientific evidence of what his BAC would have been at the time of driving. Based upon these factors, the State agreed to reduce the charge.

Defendant was charged with a DUI following a stop for a traffic infraction. He performed above-average on FSE’s and submitted to breath testing post arrest. The State agreed to amend the charge from DUI to Reckless Driving after receiving a mitigation packet from our office.